People who have not conformed to judgments handed down to them. Dr. Donald Clarke makes an interesting point:
“The database serves two purposes. First, it is intended to put pressure on defendants to perform judgments. This might function through a kind of public shaming, although it’s not very public. More effective, I think, is the way this database can function as a check on the trustworthiness of potential business partners. If judgment-scoffers routinely find that nobody wants to do further business with them, they will have an incentive to comply.
Second, it is intended to put pressure on the reporting courts themselves to work hard on getting judgments performed; it looks bad when the public can look up judgments that are years old and still unexecuted.”
While the database is in Chinese, it can still be used as a valuable tool.
Check it out here
1 response so far ↓
1 Form Script // Aug 24, 2010 at 1:06 pm
hey man I like it. I’m about to write more posts and put your ideas to the test. After all, we always have something new to learn and being humble, I came here to learn. Bookmarked.
- Josh
Leave a Comment